The second wave of presentations was today, and much of the progress can be seen in the group presentation in the main blog post. Materials have in large part been taken from the Spartan Superway fabrication shop, with the few materials having been purchased so far including cast iron casters, steel bolts, and corresponding washers and nuts. The prototype is currently being built atop an old lathe stand as a temporary base, as the size and weight of it are useful for resisting the applied forces from the bender.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Week 7: Materials, Design Maturation
The design for the rapid prototype has been reverted towards
the original design in lieu of a Hossfeld bender, in light of material
acquisition, available support options, and details from the track improvement
team. Further revisions will be made as necessary with concerns towards the
final design.
Since last week’s post, additional materials have been gathered
from the Spartan Superway shop and sourced from local hardware stores for the
build. An old lathe stand will be used as a temporary base, as its size and
weight appear to be sufficient for the moment. A more permanent stand for
placement in the Spartan Superway shop will require additional research at a
later date.
In more specific detail:
A cast
iron wheel from a caster will be used on the arm to push against the material.
The arm
may be one of several pieces, either solid rectangular aluminum or tube steel.
The die
will be cut from plywood, with metal banding added if it proves too malleable.
Pins
and the center pivot will be made from either aluminum or steel bar stock.
The square
block to hold the material will be made from square aluminum stock.
3/8” or
½” shoulder bolts will be used to bolt the bender to the lathe stand.
Large diamond
plate, aluminum plate, or plywood will be used to bridge the lathe stand
plates.
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Week 6: Bender Redesign, Need Numbers
The original bender idea has been thrown out completely.
Imbalanced forces and unique pieces increase the liability of something
breaking, especially in the future where users may assume the system is more
robust than it actually is and treat it as such.
Therefore, the focus will now be on replicating a Hossfeld
bender or a design very similar to it. The overall simplicity of the design,
and the versatility provided by the pin positions, clamping blocks, and die
size should be more than sufficient for the needs of the project. The image of
the Hossfeld we will attempt to emulate, and the key components identified are
below. Die size, the main determinator of our bender’s output, will depend on
the final numbers from the track improvement team. The current 18” or 20”
radius necessary invalidates a die 1:1 in size, so curves will have to be bent in
individual sections.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
Week 5: Redesign Details, Bender Rework?
As of the writing of this post, access to on-campus labs has
not yet been granted. Work with the track improvement, bogie design, and other
teams continue, and final dimensions of the bender have not yet been
determined. Initial information from the track improvement team suggests that
the radius used will be similar to the largest radius of the track developed
last year, which may ease production as having a larger radius will mean that
the material may require less force to manipulate. There’s been no new information
yet on the radius required for the section of track that constitutes the
station, more specifically about whether the dimensions are different or the
same compared to what was used previously.
An initial idea for a bender setup was detailed in last week’s
post, but evaluation of that design yet continues. Unbalanced forces may prove
troublesome over time, so the current thought is to replace the arm with a
proper Y-shaped arm, resulting in a design much more similar to a Hossfeld than
the original. The base plate may remain the same, unless the bolts/cylinders
affixed to it cannot be kept strictly vertical. In either case, the Hossfeld design
appears to be much more simple than the DiAcro design, in large part due to the
acceptable tolerances on the arms when compared to the circular shape and
chain/gear utilized by the DiAcro design. Expect more definite information next
week, as prototyping is scheduled to start in short order.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)