As of the writing of this post, access to on-campus labs has
not yet been granted. Work with the track improvement, bogie design, and other
teams continue, and final dimensions of the bender have not yet been
determined. Initial information from the track improvement team suggests that
the radius used will be similar to the largest radius of the track developed
last year, which may ease production as having a larger radius will mean that
the material may require less force to manipulate. There’s been no new information
yet on the radius required for the section of track that constitutes the
station, more specifically about whether the dimensions are different or the
same compared to what was used previously.
An initial idea for a bender setup was detailed in last week’s
post, but evaluation of that design yet continues. Unbalanced forces may prove
troublesome over time, so the current thought is to replace the arm with a
proper Y-shaped arm, resulting in a design much more similar to a Hossfeld than
the original. The base plate may remain the same, unless the bolts/cylinders
affixed to it cannot be kept strictly vertical. In either case, the Hossfeld design
appears to be much more simple than the DiAcro design, in large part due to the
acceptable tolerances on the arms when compared to the circular shape and
chain/gear utilized by the DiAcro design. Expect more definite information next
week, as prototyping is scheduled to start in short order.
No comments:
Post a Comment