The track manufacturing and process development team for the 1/12 scale model is a new team starting this year, and determining what needs to be focused on from the get-go is not yet entirely clear. However, several issues appear to stand out, according to accounts from teams working on the model from last year. Investigating potential changes by the bogie and track improvement teams and working alongside them to aid in a better potential track design will be paramount, and will most certainly provide direction for the track manufacturing team.
Certain sections of track were created by an external company (Vanderbend), and other sections of track were created in-house, leading to discrepancies and unequal end product which did not allow for uniform functionality of pod cars. We are to devise an in-house method for fabrication, or standardize methods to be outsourced.
Availability of stock for the project, and common means for its manipulation for use, shall be investigated. Additionally, any specialized processes, tools, or training that may be required to aid in fabrication shall be pursued.
Frequent discussion between teams will be encouraged to ensure pertinent details are shared and that each team has meaningful input to aid in the overall design.
Assessment of the bogie design and track design changes, and evaluation possible methods of fabrication for the planned designs this year are forthcoming. Assessment of available in-house equipment to enable support beyond the end of my time working on the project will aid those that follow in my footsteps.
Records of any fabrication methods will be used to aid in documentation for the eventual hand-off of the task. Ensuring that detailed instructions are provided for every process so processes can be replicated precisely will be helpful.
Some issues concerning the scale model will be highlighted in next week's post, after I talk with Kenny Strickland, a member of last year's small-scale track team.
Monday, August 29, 2016
Week 1: Beginning and Introduction
I begin with the Spartan Speedway project
this week as part of the 1/12 scale track manufacturing/process development
team!
I have helped my dad fix or build things
in the backyard since I was young, using mainly hand tools. The degree of error
that could be tolerated for what we were doing was fairly large. One of the
projects that I worked on when I was a kid included helping to rebuild a fence
with wood boards, metal brackets, nails, and a hammer. As you can imagine, the
nails could be located almost anywhere, meaning that precision and tolerance played
almost no role at all.
Later on, I began to work on project that
required more precision, such as soldering. When working with a circuit board
for the first time, I was careful, but not careful enough. I didn’t pay enough
attention to the iron and melted a previous solder joint to bridge two pins,
creating a short in the board and frying a component. This was one of the many
cases where I learned that precision is important and necessary to help create
something to work exactly as planned.
During middle school, I was a member of
the school robots team, and was responsible for ensuring that our robot was
programmed to run well to complete the predetermined actions and courses for
the inter-school competition. I quickly found that the team responsible for
physically building the robot did not pay much attention to precision, as some
of the components that they used for one side of the robot did not match the
capabilities of the components used on the other side. The asymmetrical
performance of the different components made it much harder to get the robot to
perform all tasks as well as it might have been able to.
In high school, I helped create 3-D models
as part of yet another inter-school competition. I was able to use a laser
cutter for the first time, which I assumed would help with many of the
precision issues that I had seen before. However, my calculations and rounding
of numbers worked against me, as the scale to which I was building the model did
not allow for assumptions as large as I had made. This lack of precision
resulted in an abundance of extra work and time, which yet again showed me the
necessity to work carefully when creating something, especially where precision
is paramount.
Having learned from experiences such as
these and many more, I intend to work carefully and precisely in order to aid
the repeatability and reliability of the means to fabricate necessary parts for
the project.
—Kevin Yoshihara
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)